Tren Komunikasi dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Arab: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis (2020-2025)

Authors

  • Gufron Zainal Abidin Sdawi Manasiq IAI Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan Author
  • Abd.Ghani, M.Pd.I Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.111322/qyxm4b30

Keywords:

Tren Komunikasi, Teknologi Pendidikan, Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi, mengevaluasi, dan mensintesis bukti-bukti empiris mengenai tren komunikasi dalam pengajaran bahasa Arab antara tahun 2020 dan 2025. Tinjauan ini secara spesifik menganalisis jenis-jenis tren komunikasi yang dominan, efektivitasnya dalam meningkatkan keterampilan bahasa Arab, serta tantangan dan faktor keberhasilan implementasinya. Tinjauan literatur sistematis ini dilakukan mengikuti pedoman PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Pencarian literatur dilakukan di enam database akademik utama (ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, dan ScienceDirect) untuk artikel penelitian primer yang diterbitkan antara Januari 2020 dan Oktober 2025. Proses seleksi melibatkan screening judul dan abstrak, diikuti oleh penilaian full-text berdasarkan kriteria inklusi-eksklusi yang ketat. Penilaian kualitas dan risiko bias dilakukan menggunakan Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. Sintesis data dilakukan secara kualitatif (analisis tematik) dan kuantitatif (meta-analisis terbatas). Dari 72 catatan awal, 20 studi memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan dianalisis. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan jumlah publikasi pada tahun 2024-2025. Tren komunikasi yang paling dominan dan efektif adalah Mobile Learning (M-Learning), Digital Teaching Tools, dan Blended Learning, yang secara konsisten menunjukkan efektivitas tinggi (65% studi) dalam meningkatkan keterampilan bahasa, terutama keterampilan berbicara (speaking skills) dan kompetensi komunikatif interaktif. Meta-analisis terbatas pada 8 studi kuantitatif menunjukkan ukuran efek gabungan yang besar (pooled effect size, Cohen's d = 0.81 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.96]), yang mengindikasikan dampak positif yang kuat dari intervensi komunikasi berbasis teknologi. Tantangan utama yang teridentifikasi adalah keterbatasan infrastruktur teknis (dilaporkan oleh 40% studi) dan kurangnya persiapan guru (35% studi). Tren komunikasi modern, khususnya yang berbasis mobile dan blended learning, secara signifikan mentransformasi pengajaran bahasa Arab dengan meningkatkan engagement, personalisasi, dan efektivitas pembelajaran

References

Abdul Ghani, M. T., Hamzah, M., Wan Daud, W. A. A., & Muhamad Romli, T. R. (2022). The Impact of Mobile Digital Game in Learning Arabic Language at Tertiary Level. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1), ep344. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11480

Ahmed, M. M.-D. (2023). The Impact of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Learning Arabic. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12946.77767/2

Akla, A. (2021). Arabic Learning by Using Hybrid Learning Model in University. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 13(1), 32–52. https://doi.org/10.24042/albayan.v13i1.7811

Al Bataineh, K. B., Ahmed Banikalef, A. A., & H. Albashtawi, A. (2019). The Effect of Blended Learning on EFL Students’ Grammar Performance and Attitudes: An Investigation of Moodle. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3367595

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2022). Using Digital Learning Platforms for Teaching Arabic Literacy: A Post-Pandemic Mobile Learning Scenario in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(19), 11868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911868

Alandejani, J. A., & Sayed, G. (2024). The implementation of high-impact practices and communication competency using the Arabic language. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2401253. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2401253

Amir-Behghadami, M., & Janati, A. (2020). Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emergency Medicine Journal, 37(6), 387–387. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209567

Anggara, S. A., & Wadda’wah, U. D. (n.d.). 1 | ISSN (e) 2963-4318 INTERACTIVE APPROACHES IN ARABIC LANGUAGE TEACHING: EFFORTS TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS.

Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C., Porritt, K., Pilla, B., & Jordan, Z. (Eds.). (2024). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-01

Auliya, A., Surya Aljanah, D., Sagala, R., Hijriyah, U., & Ghazi, F. (2025). The Digital Revolution in Arabic Language Learning: An Analysis of Trends, Results, and the Future of Language Education in the Digital Age. RADEN INTAN: Proceedings on Family and Humanity, 2(1), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.47352/3032-503x.69

Benchahda, K., & Abderrahmane, F. (2024). THE EFFECTIVE ROLE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN ARABIC LANGUAGE EDUCATION. 1.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

Burston, J. (2014). The Reality of MALL: Still on the Fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103–125. JSTOR.

Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069

Garba, M. A., & Hassan, A. R. (2024). Use of AI in Learning Arabic Language by Non-Arabic Speakers. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(VIII), 2519–2532. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8080191

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

Haq, A. Z., Akmansyah, M., Erlina, E., & Koderi, K. (2024). Technology integration in arabic language learning: A literature review on the effectiveness of e-learning and mobile applications. Journal of Research in Instructional, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v4i2.473

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604

Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062

Long, M. H. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3

M. Safarul Khair. (2025). Student-Centered Learning and Collaborative Learning in Arabic Language Education. An Nazhair: Journal of Arabic Education, 2(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.20414/nazhair.v2i1.63

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second Language Research (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750606

Mahmoud, M. H., & Abo El-Hamayed, S. H. (2016). An intelligent tutoring system for teaching the grammar of the Arabic language. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 3(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesit.2016.04.001

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Oller, J. W., & Krashen, S. D. (1988). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Language, 64(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.2307/414800

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Saad, R., Baharudin, H., & Nik Yusoff, N. M. R. (2025). The Use of Digital Teaching Tools to Support Arabic Speaking Skills in Secondary School: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Process International Journal, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.404

Sholahudin, S., Nurbayan, Y., & Ali, M. (2025). The Competence of Arabic Language Teachers in The Digital Era: A Study Based on The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Framework. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science, 6(3), 2055–2065. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3940

Downloads

Published

2025-07-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tren Komunikasi dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Arab: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis (2020-2025). (2025). Journal of Education and Contemporary Linguistics , 2(02), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.111322/qyxm4b30