Sejarah, Implementasi, dan Dampak Peraturan Basel I, Basel II, dan Basel III di Indonesia

Authors

  • Mayogi Araffi Author
  • Rosihaturrosyidah Author
  • Joko Setyono Author

Keywords:

Basel, Histori, Implementation, Impac, Islamic Banking

Abstract

This research aims to find out how the history, implementation, and impact of Basel I, II, III regulations in Indonesia. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The results showed that the history of Basel I was initiated due to concerns over the Latin American debt crisis (Brazil, Argentina, Mexico) in the early 1980s. Basel II was initiated due to changes in the banking industry and financial markets including the financial crisis that occurred in Southeast Asia and South Asia in 1997-1998. Basel III was initiated due to the global financial crisis that occurred in 2007-2009. Then, Basel I implemented a measurement framework for credit risk, requiring a minimum capital standard of 8%. Basel II created three pillars, namely pillar I minimum capital requirements, pillar II regulatory supervision, and pillar III market discipline. Basel III includes RWA calculation for operational risk, RWA calculation for credit risk, RWA calculation for market risk and Credit Valuation Adjustment. The impact of the implementation of Basel I in Indonesia is considered to have no effect on capital targets or credit risk targets, as it is considered that the creation of Basel I ignores the regulatory implications on banks in developing countries and is considered as a banking standard that is international in scale and adaptive to banking in developed countries. Basel II also does not have a significant impact on the banking sector and industry development, and is considered detrimental to banks in developing countries, while Basel III is considered to have a positive impact on banking in Indonesia. Such as the condition of Bank BNI's capital after the implementation of Basel III on Bank BNI's business growth.

References

Balin, B. J. (2008). Basel I, Basel II, and Emerging Markets: A Nontechnical Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Bonnario, M. (2018). Dampak Implementasi Basel III Terhadap Permodalan Pada Bank di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Pada PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Aliansi : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 13(2), 93–102.

Gunawan, A. (2021). Determinan Profitabilitas Perbankan Bank Buku IV Era Implementasi Penuh Regulasi Basel III Perbankan Indonesia. Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(6), 2637–2648.

Handayani, T., & Abubakar, L. (2018). Regulasi Pengelolaan Likuiditas Bank melalui Kewajiban Penerapan Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) sebagai Upaya Menciptakan Perbankan yang Sehat. Varia Justicia, 14(1), 10–20.

Khan, F. N. H. T., Malim, N. A. K., & Masron, T. A. (2021). Islamic Regulations and Islamic Banks Margins: An Empirical Investigation Into Asean Countries. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7(1), 127–154.

Khanifa, N. K. (2019). Penerapan Basel Accord Melalui Perhitungan Ekonofisika Dalam Manajemen Risiko Perbankan. SPEKTRA : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 5(1), 54–63.

Kurnia, R. A. E. (2020). Menelaah Unsur Etika Bisnis Dalam Manajemen Risiko Bank Syariah. Iqtishaduna, 11(02), 18–38.

Laksmana, K. A. R. I. (2019). Penerapan Permodalan Basel III dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Bisnis Dan Call For Paper, 346–354.

Mbate, M. M. (2014). Persyaratan Kecukupan Modal Minimum dan Perilaku Bank di Indonesia. Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 17(1), 1–13.

Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Bidang Pendidikan Bahasa.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Sejarah Standar Basel. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Putri, Y. A., Tanzil, M. N. D., & Sari, P. Y. (2019). Rasio Likuiditas dan NPLTerhadap Rasio Kecukupan Modal Setelah Implementasi Basel III. Jurnal Edunomic, 7(1), 16–24.

Sbarcea, I. R. (2014). International Concerns for Evaluating and Preventing The Bank Risks - Basel I Versus Basel II Versus Basel III. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 336–341.

Shakil, M. (2005). The Impact of Basel II on the Future of Islamic Banking. Islamic Finance: Current Legal and Regulatory Issues, 153–165.

Solissa, D. N. (2017). Kesiapan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia dalam Penerapan Liquidity Coverage Ratio Basel III. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 1(2), 165–186.

Suryanto, D. A. (2019). Pertumbuhan Kredit di Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Kepatuhan Bank Terhadap Implementasi Basel Accord I-III. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 11(2), 224–237.

Wahyu, D. R. (2019). Analisis Pembiayaan Bermasalah (Non Performing Financing) dan Kecukupan Modal (Capital Adequacy Ratio) pada Bank BRI Syariah Tahun 2011-2016. Jurnal BanqueSyar’i, 5(2), 119–140.

Wibowo, P. P. (2008). Understanding and Addressing The Pro-Cyclicality Impact of Basel II in The SEACEN Countries. The South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN).

Yushita, A. N. (2008). Implementasi Risk Management Pada Industri Perbankan Nasional. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 4(1), 75–86.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sejarah, Implementasi, dan Dampak Peraturan Basel I, Basel II, dan Basel III di Indonesia. (2024). Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Implementasi, 1(1), 1-12. https://journal.alifba.id/index.php/jei/article/view/29